• postimage

    12:16 AM Shriram Jayakumar (Legal Executive, Baker & McKenzie.Wong & Leow)

    A sensible approach to severance: Tillman v Egon Zehnder [2019] UKSC 32

    If the unreasonable portions of a restrictive covenant are severed from the reasonable portions, will employers be escaping the consequences of widely-drafted restrictive covenants that they were responsible for? Or will this allow their legitimate interests to be protected? ...

  • postimage

    11:23 AM Tracy Gani (LL.B., Singapore Management University)

    Striking a Balance Between Debtor Relief and Creditor Protection: Section 211D of the Companies Act

    Singapore’s insolvency and restructuring landscape has commended itself to a series of recent legislative amendments. These amendments are part of Singapore’s efforts to enhance its insolvency and restructuring laws to strengthen itself as an international centre for debt restructuring. In 2017, a new set of provisions relating to the scheme of arrangement procedure was introduced vide the Compani...

  • postimage

    10:56 PM Ben Chester Cheong (Lecturer of Law, SUSS; LLM (Cambridge), LLB (1st Class Hons) (Exeter), Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore))

    Director’s appointment clauses: The Wellness Group Pte Ltd v Paris Investment Pte Ltd and others [2018] SGCA 47

    The commentary will address the Court of Appeal’s decision in The Wellness Group Pte Ltd v Paris Investment Pte Ltd and Others [2018] SGCA 47 (“Director’s Appointment Suit CA”) as well as some practical implications for corporate lawyers. It is worth noting that Director Appointment Suit CA was an appeal from the earlier High Court’s decision in [2017] SGHC 298 (“Director’s Appointment Suit HC”). ...

  • postimage

    06:14 PM Shaun Pereira (Shearman & Sterling LLP)

    Arbitrating disputes under the articles of association

    A shareholder brings an action in court against a joint-venture company, alleging that the company has breached its articles of association. The article alleged to have been breached is mirrored in an identical clause in a shareholders’ agreement between the company and its two shareholders (for convenience, they are referred to as the “plaintiff shareholder” and the “other shareholder”). The shar...

  • postimage

    01:22 AM Victor Yao Lida (Justices’ Law Clerk)

    Satisfying the equity in proprietary estoppel: expectation, or reliance, or both? Satisfying the equity in proprietary estoppel: expectation, or reliance, or both?

    In satisfying the equity that has arisen in a claim of proprietary estoppel, should the courts endeavour to fulfil the claimant’s expectations, or to compensate for the claimant’s detriment? This question has arisen with increasing frequency in English jurisprudence, and the Singapore Court of Appeal had the occasion to give some observations on this question in the recent decision of Low Heng Leo...