• postimage

    05:39 PM S. Chandra Mohan (Associate Professor (Practice), Singapore Management University)

    The Discretionary Death Penalty for Murder: Guidance at Last

    In a much awaited decision, the Court of Appeal has finally provided some guidelines to judges on whether or not to impose the discretionary death penalty in murder cases. The decision of a specially constituted court of five judges, in Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 1, has made history of sorts. It is a case where five judges, of whom two delivered dissenting judgments, sat to ...

  • postimage

    12:14 PM Ronald JJ Wong and Jeremy Yeo Wen An (Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP)

    Case Comment: Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings Business Ltd and others and another appeal [2015] SGCA 8

    In Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings Business Ltd and others and another appeal [2015] SGCA 8, the Court of Appeal considered various issues of admissibility of hearsay evidence in a civil case under the Evidence Act (Cap. 97, 1997 Rev. Ed.) (“EA”), which was recently amended in 2012 on the same. This decision is illuminating for: (a) the Court’s views on the factors to be considered in exercising the ...

  • postimage

    02:53 AM Chen Siyuan (Assistant Professor, Singapore Management University)

    Misconduct and the Division of Matrimonial Assets: Clarification from the Court of Appeal Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2015] SGCA 2

    Should the fact that a wife had previously poisoned her husband with arsenic result in any reduction in her share for the division of matrimonial assets when the marriage ends in divorce? Following the appeal lodged by the husband in Chan Ting Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2014] 3 SLR 945, the Court of Appeal has now clarified in Chan Ting Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2015] SGCA 2 that extreme spousal misconduct c...

  • postimage

    03:54 PM Chen Siyuan (Assistant Professor of Law, Singapore Management University)

    Mediated Postnuptial Agreements and Ancillary Matters: Surindar Singh s/o Jaswant Singh v Sita Jaswant Kaur [2014] SGCA 37

    When the parties in a divorce have, with the benefit of legal counsel, gone through mediation and negotiated an agreement to settle the ancillary issues of maintenance and the division of matrimonial assets, is there any reason for the court to exercise its statutorily conferred discretion to ignore such an agreement or should it seek to uphold it despite objections from one of the parties? Wherea...

  • postimage

    03:54 PM Chen Siyuan (Assistant Professor of Law, Singapore Management University)

    Misconduct and the Division of Matrimonial Assets: Chan Ting Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2014] SGHC 97

    Should the fact that the wife had previously poisoned the husband with arsenic result in any reduction in her share for the division of matrimonial assets when the marriage ends in divorce? Presented with this unprecedented factual scenario, the High Court answered in the negative. This case comment suggests two ways in which the reasoning of the decision could have been fortified....