An Overview of the Impending Changes in the Family Justice Landscape
Singapore’s family justice landscape is set to witness a sea-change when the key features of the new Family Justice Act, as well as recommendations from the Committee for Family Justice (chaired by the Senior Minister of State for Law and Education, Justice VK Rajah, and Justice Andrew Phang), materialise in the months ahead.
First, organisational and structural changes are afoot. The Family Justice Courts (“FJC”) will be established to hear all family-related proceedings. The FJC will comprise the High Court (Family Division) (“High Court”), the Family Court, and the Youth Court (which supersedes the Juvenile Court). The Family Court will hear all family proceedings except those under the Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38, 2001 Rev Ed), which will be heard by the Youth Court. The High Court will mainly hear appeals against decisions from the Family Court and the Youth Court. The FJC will have its own Registry and Registrar that will receive, assign, and manage all cases for hearing. It will also have its own Presiding Judge, who will be a Judge or Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court, appointed by the President of Singapore on the recommendation of the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice, Judges of the Supreme Court, Presiding Judge of the FJC, and Registrar of the FJC will form a committee to formulate the Family Justice Rules that regulate the procedure and practice of the FJC.
Secondly, there will be greater access to family justice. Case management in the FJC will be differentiated, in that urgent cases will be put on the expedited track, while complex cases may require specialised attention. Before divorce is filed in the Family Court, couples with children must undergo mandatory consultation, unless they are able to agree on the divorce and all ancillary matters beforehand. This is to ensure that disputes can be resolved more effectively and also to ensure that the parents understand the impact of a divorce on their children. Court processes will also be simplified and streamlined, such that even litigants-in-persons – the overwhelming majority of family court users – will not face great difficulty when making applications before the court. Further, Court Friends can assist unrepresented litigants in filling court forms and other administrative and procedural matters throughout the court process. However, Court Friends will have no right of audience before a court.
Thirdly, family disputes will be made less acrimonious and traumatic in court. Instead of allowing the litigation to remain completely adversarial, judges will be required to take a more proactive and central role in court proceedings – for instance, by identifying relevant issues, identifying the evidence that needs to be adduced, regulating court procedure, and proposing options to move matters along. Consistent with this new judge-led approach, judges will also be given the power to order parties to mediate their disputes or seek other types of family support services, as well as involve social workers, psychologists, and counsellors at any point in the proceedings. For applications that involve children, mental health professionals will work with families to provide judges with bipartisan recommendations so that judges can make decisions regarding children in accordance with their best interests. In appropriate cases, Child Representatives will be appointed to act as advocates for the children.
Finally, a suite of solutions outside of the courtroom will be implemented as well. Community touch points such as the police, schools, hospitals, and grassroots members – which often play the role of first-port-of-call by directing families in need to the appropriate family support services (including social services) – would be equipped with the necessary information and skills to better facilitate their work. A whistle-blowing mechanism would also be established so that cases of child abuse, neglect, or delinquency can be reported to the authorities. Specialist Agencies handling divorce and family violence issues will be enhanced with resources for the greater provision of information, non-legal advice, case and dispute management, counselling, and tailored programmes for highly troubled families. For lawyers, there will be a Family Law Practitioner accreditation scheme. Lawyers who have undergone specialist training (such as techniques in mediation) to practice family law in a manner that is consistent with and promotes the ethos of the new family justice system will be so accredited.
The aforementioned changes to the family justice landscape dovetails with the the impending establishment of the third law school in Singapore, which is expected to have a strong focus on community law issues such as criminal and family law.
* This blog entry may be cited as: Chen Siyuan, "An Overview of the Impending Changes in the Family Justice Landscape" Singapore Law Blog (10 August 2014)
** A PDF version of this entry may be downloaded here
Archive
- 2022
- December
- October
- July
- March
- January
- Dentons Rodyk Dialogue 2021: Sustainability and Innovation for a More Resilient Future
- ASEAN Law Research Network - Conference on Sustainable Development and Commerce in ASEAN Cities
- Jones Day Professorship of Commercial Law Lecture 2021: The Legal Innovation Agenda - Pre, During and Post COVID
- Herbert Smith Freehills-SMU Asian Arbitration Lecture 2021 - Witnesses and Webcams: The Psychology of Witness Evidence in a Virtual World
- 2021
- December
- October
- September
- August
- July
- 2020
- December
- August
- July
- May
- March
- 2019
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2018
- December
- November
- October
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- February
- January
- 2017
- December
- November
- October
- SLW Academic Publications Digest (Jan - July 2017)
- Developing Singaporean Jurisprudence on Reviewing Investor-State Arbitral Awards: Kingdom of Lesotho v Swissbourgh Diamond Mines (Pty) Limited and others [2017] SGHC 195
- A Suspended State of Patent Invalidity: Sun Electric Pte Ltd v Sunseap Group Pte Ltd and others [2017] SGHC 232
- September
- August
- July
- June
- Clarifying the forum non conveniens doctrine: Rappo, Tania v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2017] SGCA 27
- Foreign bank mergers, universal succession and the Singapore Banking Act
- When will a stay of court proceedings be granted in favour of arbitration? – interpreting “null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed”
- May
- Whither punishment and deterrence in contract law? Examining the rejection of punitive damages and its implications on the penalty rule
- Policy considerations when interpreting tax statutes: Zhao Hui Fang v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [2017] SGHC 105
- Narrower Protection for Compilations: Where Creativity Trumps Effort
- April
- Guidance on the Scope of the Parallel Importation Defence under the Trade Marks Act
- Have the Singapore Courts Faltered in the Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements? TMT Co Ltd v The Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2017] SGHC 21
- Genetic affinity as a novel remedy for wrongful fertilisation – a case of assessing the incalculable? ACB v Thomson Medical Pte Ltd and others [2017] SGCA 20
- Of prima facie standard(s), bare arbitration clauses and constituting arbitral tribunals: KVC Rice Intertrade Co Ltd v Asian Mineral Resources Pte Ltd and another suit [2017] SGHC 32
- Examining the “special circumstances” test in BLY v BLZ [2017] SGHC 59: when should jurisdictional challenges result in stays of the arbitral proceedings?
- March
- February
- A distinction without a difference: L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd [2017] SGCA 3
- The Minority’s Approach to Statutory Interpretation in AG v Ting Choon Meng better accords with the Interpretation Act
- Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen clarified Contractual Interpretation but left questions about Extrinsic Evidence and the Starting Points for Interpretation
- January
- 2016
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- The limits of a case management stay to enforce the contractual bargain under an arbitration agreement: Tomolugen Holdings Ltd and another v Silica Investors Ltd and other appeals [2015] SGCA 57
- You Can Run but You Can’t Hide: Storey, David Ian Andrew v Planet Arkadia Pte Ltd and others [2016] SGHCR 7
- June
- IPOS Media Release - Cash for IP through loan financing now a reality in Singapore
- Green Men and Treacherous Crossings: Asnah bte Ab Rahman v Li Jianlin [2016] 2 SLR 944
- No reliance without expectation of returns? - Alvin Nicholas Nathan v Raffles Assets (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2016] SGCA 18
- SAL Annual Review Conference 2016
- May
- April
- Media Release from IPOS: Record strong growth in global intellectual property filings
- On The Nomenclature And Characterization Of Arbitral Awards: PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] 4 SLR 364
- Case Comment: Accent Delight International Ltd v Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar [2016] SGHC 40
- Submissions open for the TrustLaw Index of Pro Bono 2016
- Event Note: Islamic Banking & Finance Law Conference
- Protecting Business and Economic Interests: Contemporary Issues in Tort Law (18 & 19 August 2016)
- February
- January
- 2015
- December
- Implications for Sale of Second-Hand Cars in Singapore: Kau Joo Guan v Kwek Seow Hui t/a Car Dynasty and ors [2015] SGDC 279
- UK Supreme Court Confirms the Traditional Approach to the Implication of Terms: Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited and another [2015] UKSC 72
- November
- October
- Bankruptcy: the statutory demand and the security held by the creditor - Chan Siew Lee Jannie v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] SGHC 157
- The scope of ‘de novo’ review of an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction
- No enforcement of an arbitral award against a related company in Singapore based on the “single economic entity” concept: Manuchar Steel Hong Kong Ltd v Star Pacific Line Pte Ltd [2014] 4 SLR 832
- Of “Relevant Markets” and “Windfalls” – The Court of Appeal’s decision in Marco Polo Shipping Company Pte Ltd v Fairmacs Shipping & Transport Services Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 44
- A Morning with “Drones” – Report on the SMU CLE Seminar on “Using “Drones” in Singapore: An Analysis of the Unmanned Aircraft (Public Safety and Security) Act 2015”
- September
- Clash of Jurisdictions: The Applicable Standard of Review for Stay Applications Under the International Arbitration Act: Malini Ventura v Knight Capital Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 225
- Court of Appeal sets aside Mareva injunctions and ancillary disclosure orders in Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar and another v Accent Delight International Ltd and another and another appeal [2015] SGCA 45
- The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and its Joint Declaration with Singapore – Prospects, Possibilities and Predictions
- Defining Shareholders’ residual powers of management: Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment Pte Ltd and Ors [2015] SGCA 40
- Justice As Friendship: Book Review
- The Rights of Liquidators to Access Documents and Working Papers of an Insolvent Company: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and others v Celestial Nutrifoods Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) [2015] SGCA 20
- August
- SMU Criminal Justice Conference 2015
- Case Comment on Mahidon Nichiar bte Mohd Ali v Dawood Sultan Kamaldin (Non est factum)
- Seminars on Dispute Resolution in Singapore
- Amendments to the Companies Act – Audit Exemption for Small Companies
- High Court endorses the liquidator’s power to assign the fruits of a cause of action: Re Vanguard Energy [2015] SGHC 144
- Settling Down Change of Position Defence: Southage Pty Ltd v Vescovi [2015] VSCA 117
- July
- June
- Clarifications on the Mental Capacity Act
- Case Comment on Xia Zhengyan v Geng Changqing [2015] SGCA 22
- The Christopher Bathurst Prize
- PDF Versions of All Blog Entries Now Available for Download
- Singapore Law Blog Entries Now Available on Singapore Law Watch and LawNet
- Clarity in Effecting Service Outside of Jurisdiction: Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK [2015] SGHC 144
- Dual-Institution Provision in Arbitration Agreements and the Principle of Effective Interpretation: Government of the Russian Federation v I M Badprim Srl
- May
- Contractual Construction of Jurisdiction Agreements: Exclusive or Non-Exclusive - Hin-Pro International Logistics Limited v Compania Sud Americana De Vapores S.A. [2015] EWCA Civ 401
- Restraining Payment under a Performance Bond: Validity of Clauses Limiting the Grounds for Injunctive Relief
- Mortgagee’s Right to Take Possession Subject to Existing Lease: United Overseas Bank Ltd v Loh Boon Hua [2015] SGHCR 9
- Modern Studies in the Law of Trusts and Wealth Management: Theory and Practice
- Singapore Legal Futures Conference
- Singapore Court of Appeal Espouses Standards to be Met When Setting Aside an Arbitral Award and Reinforces Singapore's Pro-Arbitration Policy
- April
- Case Comment on Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical Council [2015] SGHC 58
- Equitable Remedies in Commercial Litigation
- Issues and Problems in Enforcing Arbitral Awards Across Multiple Jurisdictions: Astro v Lippo, the Hong Kong Edition
- High Court Clarifies Scope of Riddick Principle in Singapore: Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim [2015] 2 SLR 578
- Does the Obligation to Obtain the Consent of a Third Party Extend to Taking Further Steps After Rejection?
- Global Technology Law Conference 2015: The Future of Money and Data
- High Court Clarifies Law on Applications to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction: AQZ v ARA [2015] SGHC 49
- March
- Featured Articles on Exclusion of Banks' Liabilities
- Singapore Law Blog Featured in the Straits Times!
- Clarification on the Offer to Settle Regime in Order 22A of the Rules of Court: Ong & Ong Pte Ltd v Fairview Developments Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 5
- Case Comment: Golden Season Pte Ltd and others v Kairos Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd and another [2015] SGHC 38
- Case Comment: Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic v Sanum Investments Ltd [2015] SGHC 15
- Remoteness of Damage: Principle, Policy or Proportionality? (Report on SAL Distinguished Speaker Lecture)
- Understanding an Option to Renew a Lease: AREIF (Singapore I) Pte Ltd v NTUC Fairprice Co-operative Ltd [2015] SGHC 28
- Database of Articles on Singapore Law
- Case Comment: Koh Kow Tee Michael v Lee Ewe Ming Edward [2015] SGHC 60
- The Recoverability of Romantic Gifts: Kua Tee Beng v Ye Caiyan [2015] SGHC 53
- Reflective Loss, Reverse Piercing and Alter Ego in Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch [2015] SGHC 52
- February
- Equitable Compensation at a Tipping Point
- Case comment on ACB v Thomson Medical Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 9
- Is a Contractual Clause Excluding a Right of Set-Off Subject to the Requirement of Reasonableness in the Unfair Contract Terms Act?
- Case Comment on M+W Singapore Pte Ltd v Leow Tet Sin and another [2015] SGHC 10
- Case Comment: Gimpex Ltd v Unity Holdings Business Ltd and others and another appeal [2015] SGCA 8
- The Discretionary Death Penalty for Murder: Guidance at Last
- January
- The Singapore High Court Grapples with Whether Minority Oppression Claims May or May Not Be Arbitrable
- Opening of Legal Year 2015: A Year for Pushing Boundaries
- Summary of Speeches at the Opening of the Legal Year 2015
- Identifying an Interest in Land Sufficient to Support a Caveat: Salbiah Bte Adnan v Micro Credit Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 249
- Featured Articles on Protection from Harassment Act 2014
- Trusts in Commerce: Guy Neale v Nine Squares Pty Ltd [2014] SGCA 64
- Misconduct and the Division of Matrimonial Assets: Clarification from the Court of Appeal Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2015] SGCA 2
- Extent and Limitation of a “Free-Hand Rights” Clause in Building and Construction Contracts where there are Defects: Ng Boo Han & Koo Oi Lian Audrey-Ann v Teo Boon Hiang Edward [2014] SGHC 267
- December
- 2014
- December
- Contract Law Update 2014
- Launch of Singapore Law Blog Social Media Pages and Database of Academic Articles on Singapore Law
- R1 International Pte Ltd v Lonstroff AG [2014] SGCA 56: Lessons in Contractual Formation
- Singapore Law Blog is Now Mobile-Friendly!
- The Singapore International Commercial Court: A New Era in Commercial Litigation in Singapore
- Was Singapore Airlines Liable for Business-Class Seats Sold at Economy Rates?
- Singapore Law Blog Featured in the Straits Times!
- Siemens Industry Software Pte Ltd v Lion Global Offshore Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 251: Further Issues in Contractual Formation and Duress
- Proceedings Report: The 4th Asia Pacific Journal of Private International Law Colloquium
- Sign up for the Singapore Law Blog Mailing List!
- The ASEAN Economic Community and the Legal Services Market
- RBC Properties Pte Ltd v Defu Furniture Pte Ltd [2014] SGCA 62: Restatement of Law Relating to Misrepresentation in Singapore
- A Rare Case of Conspiracy by Lawful Means
- Protection from Harassment Act 2014: Offences and Remedies
- November
- Regulating Aerial Photography and Videography Proportionately: Some Thoughts on the SAL Seminar “Droning on About Journalism – Remotely Piloted Aircraft, Newsgathering, and Law”
- 4th Asia Pacific Journal of Private International Law Colloquium
- General Information on Case Comments
- The Presumption of Resulting Trust: A New Era?
- General Information on Legal News
- General Information on Journal Articles
- General Information on CLE Events
- October
- September
- Examination orders against foreign officers of a judgment debtor: Burgundy Global Exploration Corp v Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd and another appeal [2014] SGCA 24
- Singapore High Court opines on lacuna in the law on permanent anti-suit injunction in aid of foreign seated arbitration
- August
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, Volume 13, Number 2, 2013
- Misconduct and the Division of Matrimonial Assets: Chan Ting Sun v Fong Quay Sim [2014] SGHC 97
- Mediated Postnuptial Agreements and Ancillary Matters: Surindar Singh s/o Jaswant Singh v Sita Jaswant Kaur [2014] SGCA 37
- A Principled and Structured Approach For Ascertaining Beneficial Interests in Property Disputes: Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun [2014] SGCA 36
- An Overview of the Impending Changes in the Family Justice Landscape
- July
- May
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Giant Light Metal Technology (Kunshan) Co Ltd v Aksa Far East Pte Ltd [2014] 2 SLR 545
- Illegality in Contract: Poh Cheng Chew v K P Koh & Partners Pte Ltd [2014] 2 SLR 573
- Standard of Care in Negligence: BNJ v SMRT Trains Ltd [2013] SGHC 286
- Issues in Tax Avoidance: Comptroller of Income Tax v AQQ [2014] SGCA 15
- Conflict of Laws Issues: The Republic of the Philippines v Maler Foundation [2013] SGCA 66
- Liability for Misrepresentation: Defu Furniture Pte Ltd v RBC Properties Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 01
- December
Comment Section